His question seemed pretty clear to me. As indicated in the article he linked to, Google apparently raised their bounty/reward. He's asking if something happened to one of their products to cause that, or if they're just paranoid (and maybe expecting something to happen to one of their products).
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Chris Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > I couldn't quite parse out your question? > > Cheers > Chris > > > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]>wrote: > >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/23/mystery_chrome_0_day/ >> >... but that was before Google began offering up to $60,000 in bug >> bounties for the low-down on most serious, remotely exploitable bugs in its >> Chrome web browser software. >> >> Did I miss a major malware related to their warez? >> >> Or are they just paranoid? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
