Valdis, we've had spam companies suing blacklist/antispam companies before... Surely an anonymous person legitimately and legally enforcing copyright can't be harder?
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:39 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:03:03 -0500, "Mikhail A. Utin" said: > > > After all,a vulnerability and an exploit are intellectual products. Not > > sure copyright could be claimed, but why not? > > Actually, claimed or not, if the exploit was coded in a Berne signatory > country, it's almost always automatically copyrighted at creation (most > likely > to the coder, or to their employer if it was a work-for-hire). In the US, > there's a exemption for work product of federal employees - that's one of > the few ways for US-produced material to become public domain (expiration > of > term is the other one, but with ever-increasing copyright terms, it's > unclear > that anything will ever actually expire in the US). > > More interesting is the question of how to enforce a copyright claim > while remaining anonymous... > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
