-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi Dave, The Advisory was signed using 0xF236759C which is valid from 12-June-2002 through 01-Jul-2005. I queried wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net, and the key was signed by five members of my organization, another Cisco employee, a PSIRT member who additionally participates in EuroCERT, a member of CERT/CC, and a member of FIRST. It's not clear to me why you see something different -- please let us know if you have additional information that could help us understand the issue. Regards, richard. At 14:28 09/06/02 +0100, Dave Wilson wrote: >On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:00:00AM -0700, Cisco Systems Product Security >Incident Response Team wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ><SNIP> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- ><SNIP> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- ><MASSIVE SNIP - MEGA SIZED KEY ALERT> > > -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- > > >So, I'm meant to verify this e-mail was sent by Cisco, with the attached >key? Looking at wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net, I see no-one has signed your key >either. Please RTFM. Have fun, > >Dave. - -- Richard Aceves Manager, Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) Cisco Systems, Inc. +1 (408) 526-7035 http://www.cisco.com/go/psirt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.1 iQA/AwUBPXlFCvg/zCLC/3gNEQKu4QCgmK+nsxmxh1I/k+CgwlAL52BmLtEAn0WY q+eHlAHmEJw0o1P2YThmpDq2 =L4Ij -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
