[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>yes, yes it is. >> >> > >What point? > > > >>>I can can't you? Network insecure not FUD - reality. Jealous >>> >>> >>that some cashed in? I am. >> >> >>statements like these were over simplified, and generally engin >>eered for >>ultimate FUD factor, to generate nervious-ness, revenue etc. >> >> > >FUD typically something false - engineered to create panic. Much like entire PHC >movement. > > > >>but no, i'm not much of a hacker so i can't actually. >> >> > >Then how can you make calls to hackers for action? > > i've not called for anything *yet*
> > >>>Information should be free. Hacking is information. Hacking >>> >>> >>not illegal. >> >> > > > >>hacking is a verb, information is a noun. if i break a system a >>nd >>uncover information best made public on it... *then* i will lib >>erate it. >> >> > >Yes but not hacking. > > ..explain? > > >>>Unless you sell-out dot-bomb effect nothing >>> >>> >>> >>that's my point. >> >> > >My point - those disillusioned burned because they sold out. Do you speak for PHC? >Did PHC sell out? > > i do not speak for them. i assumed you were making the assumption that they sold out. > > >>>look around themselves see missed boat-missed opportunity. >>> >>> >>> >>its debateable, are you saying this is the motivation for the P >>HC >>whitehat h8 effect and its pr0j3ct m4yh3m activities? >> >> > >Why they upset? Did they burn by selling out? > > > >>>>-Cheat death again- >>>> d34dh1tl3r <-RIP >>>> >>>> >>>Good riddance >>> >>> >>> >>... elaborate? >> >> > >happy he gone. > > > why? > >Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
