-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At Freitag, 10. Januar 2003 17:15 Ken Dyke wrote: > "Historic facts" indicates a lack of understanding of history. > </pedantic>
Yes. </conceding> > Without a mult-point view of history the decision of what to do "NOW" > will, to a very high order, be wrong. And with a multi-point view of history this is not different. Just the opposite, because the illusion to have a multipoint view (about the present and not about the past) will create the false assumption "to be in the know". Consequently erroneous assumptions and conclusions will be overlooked, more probably. > I think, therefore, ken_i_m Nope. Therefore you think that you are the thinker (or Ken or whatever). If you love to be pedantic in your thinking, go the whole way. Otherwise the points where you stop to be pedantic are an indication of your unchallenged illusions, of your unverified copies from historic scriptures. You certainly wouldn't execute a script on your workstation without having analyzed it first. With your brain you seem to be less aware. Why else would you copy and reproduce variants of old, wrotten bullshit (aah, say: historic scripts) like "I think, therefore I am" ? Ka - -- http://www.khidr.net/users/ka/pgpkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE+IFaC72vu22ltWBERAhjIAJ9MjkByVHcnqL8mO/rfo6422kT5tACfUpHE iQZjMr9VQkIsDsUxeE4fBS4= =VUdu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
