At 08:13 AM 26-01-2003 +0000, you wrote:
Hello while doing a scan for format strings vulns on util-linux package it
came back with the following results.
./login.c:398 FUNC fprintf
./login.c:425 FUNC fprintf
./login.c:597 FUNC fprintf
./login.c:614 FUNC fprintf
./login.c:775 FUNC printf
./login.c:796 FUNC fprintf
./login.c:800 FUNC fprintf
./login.c:1109 FUNC syslog
./login.c:1119 FUNC printf
./login.c:1127 FUNC fprintf
./login.c:1183 FUNC fprintf
./login.c:1190 FUNC fprintf
./login.c:1201 FUNC fprintf
./passwd.c:161 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:174 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:175 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:176 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:181 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:186 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:197 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:204 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:222 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:223 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:277 FUNC fprintf
./passwd.c:316 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:323 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:331 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:401 FUNC syslog
./passwd.c:410 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:414 FUNC printf
./passwd.c:420 FUNC printf
There is also a few other on other programs but i thought these 2 would be
most important since passwd is suid and login could be exploited remotly.
I am not very experianced in format strings any help/commets would be
great. Would these be able to get exploited?
i'm not sure what utility you used to find those "vulns", but i think that
author should have his head examined, or perhaps you're just too ignorant
to know how to properly work it. there are *no* format string
vulnerabilities in the files you reported. the lack of a format specifier
does *not* implicate bad code. printf("you are dumb"); is perfectly legal ..
Regards
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.b0f.net
<http://uk.yahoo.com/mail/tagline_xtra/?http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail_storage.html>With
Yahoo! Mail you can get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
