Yo, you gotta just respect eeye or die. Know what I'm sayin', they don't lie. A well written advisoriy can be shy, yo the exploit is tight like chai. Fuck with eeye and you die. Don't say script kid wrote it, you are making me cry.
You don't see it comin' you are already infected, injected and soon they will be resurrected. In your face, you suck whitehat dick with grace and must be rejected. By people who will never repect you. So shut up, sit down, take it like a man, they are about to clown. Don't frown, brown is about to make his way down to your gay ass town. Running around, they found a way to make everyone's shit crash and go away. This was already known, an exploit was already being used, someone automated it using some advanced shellcode shoes. Leaving you bruised, this looks like a proof of concept virus for your ass, so stop drinking boos. Shit's unreleased haven't you heard the news, phychos and biotches are soon to be amused. Shut the front door, be quiet and wait to be analally used. Just wait until someone makes a proof of concept internet bringer downer and see what happens you hate monger. Don't be stupid and don't be a snitch, E to the motherfuckin' Eye bitch! --- Nicolas Villatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am sorry but people who made this virus does not > appear as script > kiddies to me. Do you prefer to be aware of the > exploit like the ones > that will use it after some modifications or do you > prefer only some > "elite" is able to harm the systems? > > Personally, I prefer to die seeing my enemy than > being stabbed. > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De�: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] De > la part de Strategic > Reconnaissance Team > Envoy�: lundi 27 janvier 2003 3:19 > ��: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet�: [Full-Disclosure] [Secure Network > Operations, Inc.] Full > Disclosure != Exploit Release > > All, > > I have been following the subject of full disclosure > for a while, and as > most of you know, have dealt with some of the issues > that full > disclosure can cause (HP/Secure Network > Operations/DMCA). While the > idea of full disclosure is a good idea, and while we > support it, we feel > that the exploit source code should not be released > to everyone. > > It is possible to prove a vulnerability exists by > releasing well written > advisories. Because of this fact, proof of concept > code (exploit > source) is not a requirement for the education of > the possibly > vulnerable. Releasing non-malicious exploit code is > also not an option > as any local script bunny/kiddie can easily render > it functional. > > Proof of concept code is useful for legitimate > contract based > penetration tests. It is also useful for study as it > demonstrates > fundamental flaws computers today (not built in > security). But again, > proof of concept code is not for everyone. > > I am interested in hearing the opinions of the > people on this list. If > you are for exploit source disclosure, I would like > to hear arguments > supported by facts, that explain why. I am equally > interested in > reasons why not to disclose information. > > With that said, Secure Network Operations, Inc. will > no longer be > releasing functional proof of concept code. We may > release sufficiently > detailed advisories. > > > -- > Sincerely, > Adriel T. Desautels > Secure Network Operations, Inc. (SNOsoft) > phone: (978) 263-3829 | http://www.snosoft.com > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > http://www.snosoft.com/documents/SNOsoft-corporate-outline.pdf > BEDD 0FAD 4CE2 6399 551F 86F5 B036 A540 D47C EC101 > > > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/x-pkcs7-signature name=smime.p7s __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
