Actually,
Not to contradict you, but no we won't. We are considering creating
signatures for both. Our goal is to help the security industry, not to
damage it. On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:50, Florian Weimer wrote: > Strategic Reconnaissance Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It is possible to prove a vulnerability exists by releasing well written > > advisories. Because of this fact, proof of concept code (exploit > > source) is not a requirement for the education of the possibly > > vulnerable. > > If you don't publish such code, you will eventuall kill projects like > Nessus and Snort by starvation. Is this your intention? -- Strategic Reconnaissance Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Secure Network Operations, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
