-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 12 February 2003 8:49 pm, yossarian wrote: > Well, ahm, I said considered illegal by some people, I was referring to the > lines in the Cybercrime Treaty on disclosing information that CAN be used > for illegal activities. That is why I just gave an URL - allthough I > believe Paul to be an honest person, I cannot verify if his intentions are > 100% legal, nor that he sent the e-mail, nor that he is the only person > reading the mail. The treaty does not go into forums or mailinglists. The > information passed on this forum might well be used for any / some of the > offences covered by the treaty. IF any info on this forum is linked to a > specific case in court, ALL subscribers of course will be suspects. Now > that TIA is on hold, how are they ever gonna catch the bad guys posing as > security specialists? And how am I to know everybody reading this list, or > any of the one-line archives, is not a criminal? Regardless, everyone and there dog knows about the unicode directory traversal exploit. It was actually demostrated live on "the screen savers" on techtv. I think you're safe handing out this information.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+SyZ41mDajpZ9rHwRAp0vAJ0edNT6XRgZMyUw+xx5Myp0cCl8EQCgtQ2x Qwwgw9wvc+SdkZklPyLlkQQ= =BGK1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
