Pressured by whom? It might be a good idea to move the archives to a server in a country that has different laws concerning full disclosure. Say for instance the Netherlands (where the non-US archives of debian reside)
Gr, Ivo van Dongen On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 16:18:56 -0500 Len Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have come under some pressure to delete part of the > information from the message disclosing the Kerberos 4 > vulnerability recently posted. > > We would like to publicly announce our position in > regards to the material within the Full Disclosure > mailing list archives. > > We strongly feel that: > > 1. The archives reflect the entire mail traffic of the > list, which is composed of individual messages sent > by many different individuals. > > 2. The contents of these messages have become a matter > of public record once they were distributed to both > those who are subscribed to the mailing list, and > mirrored by various sites who also archive the mailing > list. > > 3. It would violate the editorial integrity of the > archives and would also demonstrate a measure of > editorial control over the content of the archives > that we are not prepared to exercise. > > 4. That it is pointless to "delete a message" since > the message contents are already widely disseminated, > cached, stored, and otherwise ingested worldwide. > > To summarize, we are sorry that we cannot comply with > any requests to delete the message in question, or any > other for that matter. > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
