On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Zach Forsyth wrote:

> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 10:20:34 +1000
> From: Zach Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: eddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm
>
> Who are you the netiquette nazi?
>

No, the grammar nazi. You're missing a comma up there.
Unless, of course, you mean "Who IS you the netiquette nazi?"
in which case I haven't a clue. This is fun, can we try speeling
flayms next?

Eddie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 6 June 2003 9:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm
>
>
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Ben Tyson-Norrman wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 18:11:07 +0100
> > From: Ben Tyson-Norrman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm
> >
> > As I started this one - can I put a stop to it...
> >
> > What was it I read the other day, if you call someone a Nazi then
> > officially that's the end of the thread...
> >
> > Okay I'm going to call me, [EMAIL PROTECTED], erstwhile postee in
> > html, user of Windows 2000 (and BSD and Linux and Solaris, before you
> > start), sending email via Exchange which attaches a crappy disclaimer
> > - a complete and utter Nazi....
> >
>
> Ahhh, you refer to Godwins Law, (Godwin's Rule) Any off-topic mention of
> Hitler or Nazis will bring the thread it is mentioned in to an
> irrelevant and off-topic end very soon; every thread on UseNet has a
> constantly-increasing probability to contain such a mention.
>
> However, Quirk's Exception: Intentional invocation of this so-called
> "Nazi Clause" is ineffectual. (net.legends faq)
>
> And so this worthless thread continues...
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Reply via email to