"morning_wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You could have just asked people to vote instead of pointing out a > negative. > I would prefer an unbiased judgement. But by stating the above, you imply to > the > general list that I already have done "bad" in some way.
Whilst -- gulp -- in general I agree with this observation of yours, the fact that enough folk have asked the list admins to address your "situation" that they have been "driven" to do this does, in fact, mean you have "done bad". Unfortunately for you, your ego is such that you saw the mainly no-names encouraging you to continue posting as evidence you were "doing good" (or at least "not bad"), rather than properly weighting the commentary of those suggesting you desist. (And no, much as on average I find your posts irritating, clueless, and largely irrelevant and childish, I was not one of the complainers. After all, there's a Delete key on this keyboard, my Email client listens to it and if you continue to get worse I can even go the further step of filtering out your messages...) Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
