Peter.. I have to agree with you on IPCop.. Have been running Smoothwall for almost a year.. IPCop is a much better solution
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Peter E. Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Gary, > > For a linux firewall, I'd would go with IPCop www.ipcop.org , which is a > linux distro dedicated to being a firewall and intrusion detection(snort) > distro with good VPN and DMZ support, which I imagine you want, and don't > have the time and resources to fool with doing it all by hand. There is > lots of documentation in many languages and has good community support. > Securityfocus has a good article on it, even tho its an older version. > http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1556 > > If you have more questions, you can post them on > http://ipcop.hopto.org/ > or > http://www.security-forums.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=19 > > Cisco Netranger is ok, but reporting functions aren't that great. > > > Peter > > p.s. I wonder if the other guys can read, or just preach BSD to everyone. > > > Spencer, Gary TRI-S INC ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > Hello everyone. I have been following the discussions for a few months now > > and enjoy the technical information that everyone has to share. What would > > your recommendations be for a Linux firewall? And would you use a 50,000 > > Cisco firewall instead?? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gary. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE+8TESX3lbyIti9jYRAtCLAJ97E7sxbJ8dTYEOzXd6dnJkbyr+4wCg0PTF > 6YXuCnsEd4oTh3A9WGmmHd8= > =zDJL > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
