Well it gave me a good laugh on a Friday afternoon anyway :) Read the code, it doesn't send that "shellcode" to a remote server at all, it executes it.
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 16:15, Michael wrote: > Maybe now we can STFU and concentrate on actual disclosure? > I'm curious as to why there has been no discussion about this apache report. > > The poster of this message didnt include any info on the details of the problem > nor an exploit, which leaves us wondering. (The insult was cute though) > > This could be some serious isht if indeed it is true. > > Can anyone confirm/dispute? > > > -M > > -- > . Michael Jastremski ............................................................. > .. Network Engineer > Megaglobal Networks > Megaglobal.net ....................... > ...... Photographer > Open Photo Project > Openphoto.net ........................ > .......... Resident > West Philadelphia > Westphila.net ........................ > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html -- James Greenhalgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
