-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 04:55:35PM -0400, Christopher F. Herot wrote:
>
>
> This is essentially what RCN is doing. Like Shawn McMahon, I found
> myself paying another $20 a month for the privilege of not having port
> 80 blocked and my IP jerked around at random. This is annoying but at
> least better than Comcast/AT&T/MediaOne/Cablevision which prohibits
> "servers" as if somehow only the annointed should serve up content and
> everyone else should sit passively as web potatoes and just absorb what
> they give us. Eventually they will realize that if they want broadband
> to take off they will have to get out of the way and let the users try
> applications other than web surfing.
>
And they are losing customers for this. When I spoke to them, they
refused to guarantee that they would not implement these blocks for a
static IP user, only claimed that they do not implement them.
If you are willing to spend $20 above RCN's already premium rates, you
can get multiple static IPs and an agreement that permits you to run
servers. (I will send details *off list* to anyone who wants them... we
wander rapidly away from the topic of port blocking.)
Of course, you'd be surprised at how many people *think* they want to be
able to run servers, but wind up 0wn3d...
Regards,
petard
- --
"People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die."
-- Jim Davidson, alt.folklore.urban
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQE+93IJgkiZ59A0kiQRAttsAJ98rm6NdDxdeQoU6wE/3CW4pBJ8+gCeIan7
TaIYWYCnFqESi2agjrCqLWg=
=8p5O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
