> From: Dan Stromberg > Sent: 16 July 2003 04:27 > > Actually, that's *STILL* impossible. > > No, that used to be a popular misconception. It's always > been theoretically possible for a plaintext mailreader to > allow, EG, a buffer overflow. It's harder to get it wrong > with a simpler mailreader, but far from impossible.
Outlook had one with the time field a few years back, IIRC. *finds link with google* July 19th, 2000. Time zone field even. See below: http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/alerts/id/advise57 -- Andrew G. Thomas Hobbs & Associates Chartered Accountants (SA) (o) +27-(0)21-683-0500 (f) +27-(0)21-683-0577 (m) +27-(0)83-318-4070 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
