On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:29:56 CDT, Ron DuFresne said: > I'm just trying to understand how corporate networks would/should be at > risk with this, why port 135 would not be filtered already limiting > exposure. Is there a reason why it would not be that I'm missing? The
It's the rare corporate net indeed that doesn't have a single remotely exploitable copy of IE or Outlook left in its entire address space. And Slammer proved quite well that having a firewall doesn't stop squat.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
