tcpdumb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well that's not entirely accurate. At least RaMeN had some nice features
> such as fixing the security hole it used to gain access to the vulnerable
> Host. ;) (Even if it's just a feature to prevent multiple attacks, it's
> basically a good idea)
Could you please explain in some detail how something that is both
unethical, at least under all professional computing "codes of conduct"
and/or "ethical codes" I know of and under the personal ethics of most
"security professionals" (altering the contents of a computer one does
not have suitable authority to alter in that way), and illegal in most
countries ("computer [data] tampering" or similar) is a "good idea"?
Regards,
Nick FitzGerald
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
