I would also like to know, since I though the remote computer would experience some sort of DoS instead of exploitation if the wrong return address was used.
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:20:20 +0200 Knud Erik H�jgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > morning_wood wrote: > [snip] > > THIS IS NOT THE CASE... > > this .bat works perfect... > > So somehow running the exploit from a .bat file with some shameless > selfpromotion makes svchost _not_ crash upon hitting a wrong return address? > > Would you care to elaborate on how you pull that off? > > -- > kokanin > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > -- /* "To avoid all evil, to cultivate good, and to cleanse one's mind this is the teaching of the Buddhas." Martin Ekendahl http://www.hardlined.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] */ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
