Actually Sun was right and I was wrong, they later contacted me and pointed out the issues were valid for Samba prior to 2.2.8a.
Len > ----- Forwarded message from Sun Security Coordination Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > From: Sun Security Coordination Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Samba version numbers > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:49:48 -0700 (PDT) > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)] > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Hello Len, > > > Hi.. as far as I know there is a mistake in: > > > > Security Vulnerability in Samba(7) Versions 2.2.2 Through 2.2.8 May Allow > > Remote User Unauthorized Privileges > > http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsalert%2F53581&zone_32=category%3Asecurity > > > > It should be 2.2.2 through 2.2.7a > > > > Thanks for notifying us about this. You are correct. We will make the > changes though it will probably take a few days to filter through the > system. > > Best regards, > Sun Security Coordination Team > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ----- End forwarded message ----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
