I wouldn't put it past SCO to leave up a vulnerable linux server so they can complain about "those nasty linux people breaking into us" and "see how insecure linux is?"
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 14:35, Justin Shin wrote: > No I think SCO deserves whatever is coming to them if they really are vulnerable, > because they are a bunch of jackasses. I don't think anyone can disagree with me > here. > > -- Justin > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of KF > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:42 AM > To: Gherkin McDonalds > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] SCO Web Site Vulnerable to Slapper? > > > did you talk to [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably a better place to start > than a full-disclosure mailing list. > -KF > > Gherkin McDonalds wrote: > > They seem to be running Apache/1.3.14 (Unix) > > mod_ssl/2.7.1 OpenSSL/0.9.6 PHP/4.3.2-RC on Linux, > > which, > > if I have my facts straight, is vulnerable to > > <URL:http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-27.html>. > > > > Am I correct? > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software > > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html -- Dan Stromberg DCS/NACS/UCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
