RE: [Full-Disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 02:00:38 +0000

Title: Message
ViLLaN - Yes you are correct.
 
Morning_Wood - I never denied that the tag in the header was not spam assasin.
The tag about the quarantine however is from Trends Interscan Viruswall.
 
What else are you trying to say?
That spam assasin is not only a spam filter but a virus scanner also?
 
If this is your box you are playing with is it running interscan virus wall or is viruswall sitting as a mail relay anywhere on the network?
 
Even IF spam assasin was to magically start scanning for viruses why the hell would it quarantine files to a /etc/iscan/virus/ dir?
 
YES you are still wrong
 
Kane
-----Original Message-----
From: ViLLaN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2003 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure

No one is denying that Spamassasin is in use, they are saying that the section of the header showing the path (what your original post was about from what I understood), is Interscan, not Spamassasin..  
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: morning_wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2003 10:25 AM
To: ViLLaN; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure

sigh
 
 
2. http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-linux-e/2003-Apr/0554.html
 
still wrong?
 
Donnie Werner
co-cofounder - Chief Technical Officer
e2-labs Pvt Ltd
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: ViLLaN
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure

Kane is correct... Interscan viruswall is responsible for that quarantine..

CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not a named recipient,please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium.

Reply via email to