As being one who was rightfully chastised by Kurt recently, I do believe that this could indeed have some relevance to the FD list. If by this mans actions, his past work could at all be suspect, then this is the proper venue to post it. If someone of his caliber, someone who should know the repercussions of any action taken using a computer as a tool, is used as an expert during trial, or their technical writings used as such, can we not realistically look at all of his past work as being suspect. If indeed he is a pedophile, he may have overlooked other pedophile activity in the course of his job. While I would never accuse someone whom I do not have personal proof of illegal activity, and after all he is innocent until proven guilty, I can understand why someone may want to analyze and or scrutinize his past work.
Just my 2cents worth. -----Original Message----- From: Kurt Seifried [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] CERT Employee Gets Owned Please read the list charter and stop posting junk like this. Do we know post stories about any criminal charges brought against anyone in the security industry? Should we also cover parking tickets? Kurt Seifried, [EMAIL PROTECTED] A15B BEE5 B391 B9AD B0EF AEB0 AD63 0B4E AD56 E574 http://seifried.org/security/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
