Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:08:26:15:32:27-0300] scribed: > > You have *zero* knowledge about *this* incident. And *that* was my > > point. It's bad enough that the damn news media speculates about > > everything under the sun these days. Why do *we* have to? What the > > hell is the point of speculating about all the various possibilities > > tied to an incident of which every one of us is ignorant? You may have > > extensive knowledge of pedophilia, but do you know *anything* other than > > what you've read in the news (and surely you don't buy that hook, line > > and sinker, do you?) > > The media always speculates about security, as we ever see when a teenager > releases a WORM. > > So, what can we do? Can't we talk about anything that goes to the media? > > PLEASE, STOP THE DIGITAL MASTURBATION AND OPEN YOUR EYES. IT'S ABOUT SECURITY, > IT'S A BIG ISSUE, CAUSE IT'S ABOUT CERT. > > PS: Is he a friend of yours?
Is there *NO* line? What if he'd been arrested on _suspicion_ of complicity in a liquor store robbery? Or, what if you don't like the way he looks at your girlfriend? If his current charges -- alone -- are grounds for suspecting his entire professional life and professional output, where do we draw that line? -- Best Regards, mds - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
