As it was written on Aug 28, thus LaRose, Dallas spake unto 'Richard M....:
Dallas: Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:19:36 -0500 Dallas: From: "LaRose, Dallas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dallas: To: 'Richard M. Smith' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dallas: Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dallas: Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Need contact in the BTOPENWORLD.COM Dallas: securit y department Dallas: Dallas: Does anyone have an email address for a live human being who works in Dallas: the BTOPENWORLD.COM security department? Dallas: ---------- Dallas: Dallas: If BT is compliant with RFC2142, the following addresses should be active: Dallas: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dallas: Dallas: The RIPE lookup on that IP reflects the following: Dallas: Dallas: remarks: Please send abuse notification to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Good luck! As "compliant" as they can be with the RFC, numerous emails Ive sent to both [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] have gone unanswered. And considering that they are outside of the US, I dont bother pursuing it since our government cant do much about it. Scott Birl http://concept.temple.edu/sysadmin/ Senior Systems Administrator Computer Services Temple University ====*====*====*====*====*====*====*====+====*====*====*====*====*====*====*====* _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
