> -----Original Message----- > From: morning_wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:19 AM > To: Charles Ballowe; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect > > > if the worm was active in anticipation of a patch that > intoduced a new exploit vector and it took advantage of that, > is'nt the vendor ( microsoft ) to blame then? As well there > was plenty of advanced warning on this exploit long before > msblast was an issue. It seems to me that it is each admins > responsiblity, if they were affected ( infected ) not the > coder. if this were the case the LastStage(of)Delerium would > be the blamed party for developing and releasing the exploit, > but alas.. they are not of USA orgin. SUE LITIGATE BLAME PROCECUTE > So you would blame murder victims for being in the wrong place? Or rape victims for wearing the wrong clothing?
Nice set of ethics there. Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
