On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:42:58AM -0700, Tim wrote: > > I don't know about catastrophic, but it certainly should be faster. I > personally find the speed of this list unacceptable. For large lists > with high volume, a list server written in a scripting language like > python isn't going to cut it, IMHO. I vote for qmail w/ ezmlm(-idx). > (That is, if we get a vote in the matter.)
List with thousands of subcribers and use EZMLM + qmail that uses single recipient delivery? huh, the server may need at least a dual DS3 to spit out those emails in time. Mailman+Python in this case is fine, the problem is just the old slow insecure Sendmail. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
