> > ... I guess this > > means network administrators have a small window of time to > start patching > > up systems before a virus is released. Does anyone know of > a work around > > when updating Office 2000 with an update? It asks for the > original CD that > > Office was installed from. Any thoughts? > > Go get the CD from the software safe??
I can see a number of valid reasons for not having the CD at hand... but this also raises some other question. Let's assume someone is using a pirated office version. Or a pirate XP key. Now Microsoft makes it impossible for those to apply patches. This seems to be the case. I am not sure if they deny all patches (someone from MS to comment?). Let's assume they deny providing things like the DCOM patch or this office patch. Now, the pirate machine is unpatched, probably becomes infected and thus is turned into an attacker itself. There are two ways to look at the root cause: #1 the user pirated the software and as such is fully responsible for whatever attack is carried out from his system OR #2 Microsoft knew that this system would carry out malicious action (the denied patching knowingly) and thus is to blame I would tend to #2, Microsoft should provide critical patches even to pirate copies, just to make sure its actual customers are not hit by the pirates, at least not with attacks. Of course, I see there are some good arguments against this... Does anybody know of what they actually do? And then the other vendors... In short: Is piracy becoming a mainstream source for attacks because there is a tendency to deny updates to pirates in the industry? Rainer _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
