Too late! On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:39:07PM -0700, D B wrote: > correct .... > > with an encryption layer that obscures the data so the > next "freq" isnt tattletailed thus making it hard to > know which packets are part of the actual data and > which are controlling before it hops > > and just for the record .... if this idea is original > it will be opensource licensed > > i will now move this topic off this list > > thank u all > > D B > > "my tore up"
Thanks indeed for posting your interesting ideas, but I've just now beaten you to it, and if you *do* write such a program, my army of underworked, avaricious lawyers will sue the cr*p out of you, and you'll be working for me for the rest of your life. Not a happy prospect, I can assure you. But all the same, thanks again... - John -- "Warning: time of day goes back, taking countermeasures." John Sage InfoSec Groupie - ABCD, EFGH, IJKL, EmEnOh, Pplus+, Mminus- - ATTENTION: this message is privileged communication. If you read it even though you aren't supposed to, you're a poopy-head. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
