A corporate entity is just a collection of individuals. And in this case, those individuals have (it seems) a great deal of influence within that entity. Thus, for the purposes of this argument, the two can be treated almost interchangeably.
Businesses don't succeed or fail because of the actions of the "corporate entity." Businesses succeed or fail because the individuals with influence either do the right things or they do not.
In this case (again, it seems), the individuals with influence have shot themselves in their collective foot.
madsaxon wrote:
At 10:18 AM 9/30/03 -0400, Stormwalker wrote:
The following quotes clarify @Stake's position. It's worse than even I thought. They know better, but don't care anymore. M$ is more important than truth.
Perhaps. I caution you, however, to make a distinction between @Stake as a corporate entity and some of the individual employees thereof.
m5x
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
