I remember hearing this is another method for bypassing spam filters. Apparently some filters will pass e-mail with PGP signatures thinking it is legitimate. It is an interesting concept, though.
I think my favorite is still the jpgin an html enabled e-mail with seemingly valid information and links that is actually a link to an xss or pr0n site. Spammers are starting to use better methodologies and soon filtering options will be almost impossible. I find it amusing to see what they will do next, though. -William ######################### [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm nobody, yet.. ######################### On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Lan Guy wrote: > I just got this piece of Spam, with a PGP signature! > Lan Guy > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "sackMail" <> > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:30 PM > Subject: l, i didnt know you could put that up there , h l t > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: Q5 > > > > The following is your information. This info will make you a happier > > person. If it does not make you a happier person maybe you need > > to get out more. > > > > > > What was that thing she put up inside; > > > > http://200.206.184.201:8040/11/cgi/spind.pl?h=fi.dat&p=1a&lah=sq3ycn > > > > > > > > 2_._._._7 > > > > 1) Switch your email options; > > 3) http://200.206.184.201:8040/11/r2.html > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux) > > > > owsejfoiewur9834u9u3j4ojdflsejflkiew934udfo3i > > sfdpo32i09rediwoejdolwesdnlfklksdjfj3409jldsfdk > > sdnok3peodkpo3kdpo3kdnlaskdnlsakdnlwkd0-9 > > sfdpo32i09redswoejdolwesdnlfklksdjfj3409jlddfdk > > sdlnkfsdk.fv,fe > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
