> -----Original Message----- > From: Blue Boar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 2:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] No Subject (re: openssh exploit code?) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > My main point being there is simply no > > need for the disclosure of exploits. > > English is a funny language. Based on the rest of your note, I assume > by "no need", you mean that there's no one forcing you to release your > exploits, and you see no moral imperitive that says you should, yes? Or > do you also mean to say that there is "no need" on the part of others, > by which I mean that you don't believe that other people can put > exploits to legal, productive uses? Which makes an even better point: if there is 'no need' to disclose exploits, what are you doing on a full disclosure list in the first place?
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
