On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 16:25:23 PST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  said:

>                       SCO Security Advisory
> 
> Subject:              OpenLinux: Multiple vulnerabilities have reported in Ethereal 
> 0.9.12
> Advisory number:      CSSA-2003-030.0
> Issue date:           2003 November 07
> Cross reference:      sr883585 fz528203 erg712398 CAN-2003-0428 CAN-2003-0429
 CAN-2003-0430 CAN-2003-0431 CAN-2003-0432
> _____________________________________________________________________________

Hmm... the same bugs that everybody *else* fixed back in *June*.  I had to
go digging to verify it *was* the same set of bugs, it's been so long.

Discuss:  If an advisory is *this* late in coming, should a vendor issue it or
not?  Compare and contrast the risks of a customer getting whacked by a *very*
old vulnerability versus the risk of losing market share due to a perceived
inability to ship security fixes on a timely basis.

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to