The filtering service I sell considers PG signatures to be a plus, and is less likely to get a SPAM hit.
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 21:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi everyone > > I had to notice something today that really disturbed me. A friend of > mine(working for a very big company) complained, that she doesn't get any > mails from me anymore. It turned out, that apparently my mails went straight > into the spam filter, as I signed everyone of them. When I sent unsigned > mails, she got them. What do we learn? Crypto is bad m'kay? > But for real, does that mean that we won't be able to sign any mails anymore > soon, due to the spam problem(and stupid admins)? > 'EGovernment' is the big word everywhere nowadays. The electronic signature is > mentioned as a way to ensure the credidibility of sender and receiver. Now > what? > Guys(and girls), the situation sucks. What do you think? And, most important > of all, do you see any way to fight this behaviour? Because honestly, I > don't. > Greets > > $me > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html -- Eric J. Bowser 330.658.9858 direct 330.658.0123 fax i-TRAP Internet Security Services 888-658-TRAP toll-free 330.658.1040 local www.i-trap.net _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
