wouldn't it be the same as using port redirection on the router (it's just manipulating the packets' port in its header)?
or am i wrong? (i'd be happy -- 'cos then the solution is easy ;) > Did you try an "HTTP-wrapper"? Something like tcp2http?!? > > Stef > >> hi list, >> >> i just wonder whether it is technically possible to utilize one of those >> anonymizers (like http:// anon.inf.tu-dresden.de, JAP; this one does not >> allow other than 80/tcp and a few others) to hide use of P2P services? >> >> i only know a few anonymizers, and the two of them i checked for this >> possibility do not allow anything else than 80/tcp (ftp et al. are not >> allowed 'due to risk of abuse' -- i wonder what prevent 80/tcp users of >> misuse those services... ;). hm. >> >> after that i thought i had an idea, using port redirection (done by the >> routers i have access to), but that would only be a part (exactly one >> half?!) of the story... >> >> is there a way? >> >> tia & regards, >> >> [//eclipser] ______________________________________________________________________________ Horoskop, Comics, VIPs, Wetter, Sport und Lotto im WEB.DE Screensaver1.2 Kostenlos downloaden: http://screensaver.web.de/?mc=021110 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
