Thank you -- that is exactly what I meant. Michael.
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:07:58 -0000 "Patrick Doyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think Michael was talking about having a sendmail service running on > a firewall, and not a mail guard feature which the Cisco Pix has, > which is supposed to limit SMTP commands to a specified minimum set of > commands. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 November 2003 14:54 > To: Michael Gale > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Sidewinder G2 > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:44:01 MST, Michael Gale > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > I believe two of the most secure firewalls are Cisco Pix and the > > BorderWare Firewall. Cisco does not offer any services and > > Borderware offers a few for small business and are very restrictive. > > For a machine that doesn't have any services, the Cisco PIX is > infamous for breaking SMTP. Google for 'cisco pix smtp' and let me > know if you still > think the PIX doesn't have services on it. > > BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ > > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain > personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically > stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your > system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor > act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note > that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication > will signify your consent to this. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
