-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 08:57:32PM -0000, Richard Maudsley wrote: > Am I right in thinking that this attack is where a DNS server is broken into > and the routing table modified so that a domain name points to a different > server where the content is controlled by the attacker?
Yes and no. There are other, and better, methods to do it. > Could anyone point me in the right direction for more information. I was > hoping for a whitepaper or something... Try looking also for "DNS cache poisoning" and "DNS poisoning". - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/w+NtpdyWzQ5b5ckRAjR3AKCkXIkD1rCycrmISCpLLdxVpx5+WwCfbjHj YcJhD3MdZl/SfGcw5vAu78Y= =AWtL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
