On Friday 19 December 2003 12:20 pm, Ron DuFresne wrote: <snip>
> missed this. The reason I ask is, there has been a large shift in > the security "lists/field/top dogs" in trying to avoid casting > blame/responsibility at M$ for the products it has pushed into the > market place, perhaps due to the deep pockets and breadth of market > saturation, thus dependance of many upon the M$ pocketbook to feed > the rest of the industry in one fashion or another. The critical > articles of a year+ past seem to now, especially after the @stake > recent actions, to be focused these days upon avoiding mentioning the > shortcomings from redmond. Are others reading the same these days? Yep. -- George Capehart capegeo at opengroup dot org PGP Key ID: 0x63F0F642 available on most public key servers "It is always possible to agglutenate multiple separate problems into a single complex interdependent solution. In most cases this is a bad idea." -- RFC 1925 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
