[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:21:28AM +0200 wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:00:47 -0600 > noconflic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Putting all extortion circumstances aside in the above story, > > The last thing it says is ... > > > > "a fine of $250,000 for threats to damage computers" > > > > I am curious to see what the current properity damage laws there > > as opposed to just threating to damage properity. Wouldn't threating > > to damage computers fall under something like harrasment ? > > > > - nocon > > > > don't feed the troll richard. he is known for spreading fud. > > georgi > >
Damn, publiclly outted and dissed by "da Man". /me not worthy of such information. -nocon _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
