On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 16:13:26 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  said:

> Guys, this is getting to be a peeing contest. Can anyone confirm that the
> gcc maintainers are aware of this, and are they able to make a statement as
> to which compilers need their optimisation code sorted?

Don't even bother.  2.95 was dead a long time ago, and the gcc maintainers will
just say "It's fixed in 3.X, why you bothering to tell us about old bugs?".

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to