-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jeremiah Cornelius wrote:
|>>What could you get from pf that you couldn't get from iptables (I've |>>not played with the little devil yet)? | | Human-readable syntax. | | Lucid syntax is an indispensable security measure. Errors should be GLARING | and obvious!
~ Apart from such subjective feature could you point us to any real reference/test regarding PF vs netfilter? I've used both. I don't have a problem with iptables syntax which I find more "objective" than PF's. But I'd like to read an unbiased comparative article on performance and detailed features that would clearly state the advantages of either one.
best regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFAGUZ2Gm5OYk54E24RAiEUAJ9f0c9XbzT5yeeeP8bPZdgGe/Ma9wCfTn5c wCWnvRM9J3IEMevxYluzuF0= =DTYX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
