On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 22:59, Cael Abal wrote: > Hi Henrik, > > 8086 asm and Forth knowledge, although less common these days, isn't > necessarily an indicator of shining intelligence or insight. And as > for your 'great knowledge' comment -- the sad reality is this: It > really doesn't take a whole lot of skill to implement a Windows worm.
'Great knowledge' isn't the words I'm looking for.. My english was a bit off. What I meant was that sertainly this fellow has some skills. > It's a bit presumptuous to say with any certainty the cvs tag was a > plant -- people make dumb/costly mistakes. Personally, I could care > less about whether or not the mydoom author is caught -- there are > thousands of kids ready to take his/her spot. Well. I think that this fellow has shown enough thoroughness (from what I read here at full-disclosure. I havent had the time to analyse the worm myself yet) to at least check for dumb and costly mistakes. But I might be wrong - I just think that a person that says "Look! The name 'Andy' is in there! And there is some Forth.. Hm.. If we find a Forth-programmer named Andy - we have him!!" is...well...way off. :) And personally I don't care either. I could care less if SCO or Microsoft gets DDoS:ed.. Likewise, I won't cry if those multinational coorporations loose some money cause they can't handle a few million e-mails ;) -- Henrik Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
