-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 31 January 2004 16:37, Daniel Spisak wrote: > Look, apparently this is not the list for me to be on. All I was trying > to do at first was find B to analyze. Then I tried to provide it to > people via email but that quickly escalated past what I could > personally handle by myself. Then I gave the URL to the list and now we > have this fine mess. McAfee was just trying to give me a friendly nudge > that what I did was probably not the best method of distribution. So > try to not harbor any ill will towards them, they were just trying to > do their job. I overreacted and it would seem this situation would > dearly like to spiral out of control. I never wished to drag people I > know needlessly into a pissing match. Nor did I ever wish to intend to > make this variant more active in the wild.
You want a job with NA someday? Not that there's anything /wrong/ with that! base-64 'em, and post with with an adequate warning - to this list. They'll be web-archived within minutes anyway. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAHFVVJi2cv3XsiSARAjGaAJ429/SfuaY6O663VEeyObLyqpIzjQCg24l4 i3EQRPe9ZF63i8sWhquVXpU= =IbcU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
