Hi all ad nauseum
I believe it is full disclosure, but not the local virus code repository. There is a HUGE (no really, it is HUGE) difference between 'full-disclosure', where the nitty gritty details of a bug/exploit/hole is described and making available executable malware (read: virus/worm). I would suggest Mr FitzGerald and I believe Mr Schmehl have explained in other posts why anti-virus professionals are loathe to supply code to 'outsiders' for want of a better description. I'm quite interested in how heat seeking missiles are made and how they work, but I doubt anyone from the military will give me one for research or to alleviate my curiosity. Cheers, Brad > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 9:57 AM > Nick FitzGerald wrote: > > ":-\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > snip > I > am hoping > >>someone here has a copy of Mydoom A and B. If so, please > contact me > >>off-line. THANK YOU > > > > > > Oh good, so another lamer can "accidentally" spread it further. > > > > There is a very good rule of thumb regarding who needs > virus samples > > -- if you need to ask on a public mailing list, newsgroup etc, you > > don't need them. snip > > > > Sounds a bit elitist to me.....this is "FULL DISCLOSURE" is it not? > What about the researcher (or random curious student) who > does not have a relationship with any 'hackers' or anti-virus > vendors whom they could ask for virus samples? > > --Ben > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
