Bernhard Kuemel wrote:
Now there's a subject in my message overview that really tells me nothing: '[Full-Disclosure] [RHSA-2004:030-01] Updated ...' (the rest gets cut off because then the sender field begins. I vote for completely removing the '[Full-Disclosure]' subject prefix. I got no response from [EMAIL PROTECTED] so let's see what the subscribers think.
Umm, I probably should have checked first cause this was already discussed:
http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-August/008771.html
On
http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-August/008787.html
John Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"This has been covered several times... and we certainly *don't* want this mail coming to the list. Feel free to mail myself or Len on the subject. Discussions about subject line prefixes are off-topic for a security list."
So I'm sorry for violating the list policy. Unfortunatly writing to Len didn't relief the problem, especially as I didn't receive a response. I'll check what results the thread in the archive produced.
Bernhard
-- Webspace; Low end Serverhousing ab 15 e, etc.: http://www.bksys.at Linux Admin/Programmierer: http://bksys.at/bernhard/services.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
