also sprach Nick FitzGerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.02.08.2108 +0100]: > Actually, it is _far_ from a _typical_ MS fix.
thanks for your reply, it made me check out rfc 1630 and, tataa, user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/url is non-standard. thus, this is in fact the most surprising fix from M$ in a long time. > Second, it is very unlike MS to "fix" something when they know it will > break some systems based on the "broken" behaviour. unless of course it could harm competitors. then they will gladly do so. > > ... and absolutely ridiculous), ... > > Ahhhh -- so you're another genius who believes it is "ridiculous" to > implement standards-conforming behavior? Or are you another genius who > believes it is ridiculous for MS to implement improved security > behaviour in its historically insecure web browser? > > Or perhaps you believe _both_ changes are ridiculous? i retract my statement. i wrote that message on the train without access to the RFC. i should have known better. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "marriage is the only adventure open to the cowardly." -- voltaire
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
