-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi, My presupposition ... - US located vendor must have backdoors "by inofficiale rules of government"... Isn't it? Regards, Rafal Lesniak Ps. sorry for my poor english. On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Geoincidents wrote: > This is a serious security issue imo > > http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Upcoming/index.html > > I just saw this page for the first time today and I find this totally > unacceptable behavior from a vendor. Where is the priority for root level > exploits? Are you people comfortable knowing that a vendor has and *always > will have* full backdoor access to all your Windows systems as long as we > allow lag times like these? > > So the question is, how much longer is the security community going to > tollerate this industry supported backdoor CRAP before getting back to full > public disclosure with a 2 week warning for the vendor? Obviously force is > required when dealing with slackers. > > Geo. (why haven't the news folks picked up on this for what it is, known > backdoors to all Windows systems) > > Note to Marc from eeye, correct me if I'm wrong, most of these are backdoors > right? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBQCpNmu2ijGMJcqkLAQLKywQAssNE5DYugWPCaYGQ6qfnXWTKZs1NmsXB d9PjSSOyWHp/s3tElN6JgCjKIoyU94DE6gde/PqCTgkR2lSGh4eYpGp7AwDLGZi8 yVsuIuOd1FDRFFXpuGih2v2dbHbuFeKCaQL5o6P8SxxQKeKXQm3YzE5bi89td/Lw p5bUHx7Zjw4= =7oDj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
