-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
roberta bragg wrote: | Here's an opportunity to be heard by a number of security interested people, | many of whom, don't subscribe to this list:
Just a heads-up to anyone considering responding to this call for submissions:
The 'MCP' in 'MCP Magazine' stands for 'Microsoft Certified Professional'. The blurb next to the first News entry found at http://www.mcpmag.com/security/ says this:
"Microsoft Beefs up Online Security Offerings Perhaps no company in the industry is working harder than Microsoft at making sure the public knows what steps to take to secure its products."
Their slant isn't subtle. Although I sincerely hope this isn't the case, I have a worrying suspicion that all we're going to see in Wednesday's commentary by Ms. Bragg will be the fringe element, the lunatics and kiddies hoping to see their names in the (virtual) paper. Sadly, I just can't see a newsletter like Security Watch seriously taking Microsoft to task for their security practices.
By all means respond, but please don't make the security community out to be idiots.
Cael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAKr0nR2vQ2HfQHfsRArgHAKCLyvDWTtVD7ZeXSC4Ic0U6yrlRZwCgpUPu 6TNDTy7BNYkGgu0fwtaetU4= =GRWR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
