[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And if MailMan wasn't configured to strip RFC822 headers, we'd also have a nice
> hint as to exactly which patchlevel of the offending MUA/MTA the site was running,
> so we could arm ourselves with suitable exploits.
And you don't think you'd get that information by sending him a message
directly, expecting a vacation notice??
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Received: from SMK2.metzler.com (smk2.metzler.com) by
mail2.metzler.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with SMTP id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 04:15:45 +0100
Received: by SMK2.metzler.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-
1999)) id C1256E3B.001281E7 ; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 04:22:09 +0100
X-Lotus-FromDomain: FRANKFURT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 04:00:44 +0100
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nico_Treu/METZLER_ist_au=DFer_Haus.?=
[...]
Ich werde ab 13.02.2004 nicht im B�ro sein. Ich kehre zur�ck am
23.02.2004.
Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner R�ckkehr beantworten.
Mit freundlichen Gr�ssen
Nico Treu
No surprises there then...
Regards,
Nick FitzGerald
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html