[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> And if MailMan wasn't configured to strip RFC822 headers, we'd also have a nice
> hint as to exactly which patchlevel of the offending MUA/MTA the site was running,
> so we could arm ourselves with suitable exploits.

And you don't think you'd get that information by sending him a message 
directly, expecting a vacation notice??

   Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   [...]
   Received: from SMK2.metzler.com (smk2.metzler.com) by
    mail2.metzler.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with SMTP id
    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 04:15:45 +0100
   Received: by SMK2.metzler.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7  (934.1 12-30-
    1999))  id C1256E3B.001281E7 ; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 04:22:09 +0100
   X-Lotus-FromDomain: FRANKFURT
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 04:00:44 +0100
   Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nico_Treu/METZLER_ist_au=DFer_Haus.?=
   [...]

   Ich werde ab  13.02.2004 nicht im B�ro sein. Ich kehre zur�ck am
   23.02.2004.

   Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner R�ckkehr beantworten.

   Mit freundlichen Gr�ssen


   Nico Treu


No surprises there then...


Regards,

Nick FitzGerald

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Reply via email to