The only thing that's keeping me sane right now is the fact that the same DAT on my Groupshield systems is detecting both without fail. And a test against a client system indicates that the same DAT on VirusScan 7 systems is also effective (although nothing should be getting that far).
Ohlson_Eric wrote:
Keith,
Please post the response or fix if you get it. Thanks!
-Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith W. McCammon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 9:45 AM
To: 'Full Disclosure List'
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] W32.Netsky-B.worm spreading (name may
vary)
No coincidence. All of my gateways stopped alerting on Bagle after applying this DAT. On the phone with NAI right now...
Pete Fanning wrote:
Maybe I'm paranoid, but after applying DAT 4325 to my Webshield server
this morning to catch this new worm I all of a suddon STOPPED catching Bagle.B.
Maybe just a coincedence....maybe not.....
--- Pete Fanning MATC Technical Services Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Kruse<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/18/2004 7:57:28 AM >>>
Hi All,
This is a heads up.
A small modification of NetSky-A has started spreading in some
european
countries. Check your favorite AV-vendor for further details.
Regards Peter Kruse
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
